Debbie Dunaway Supervisor of Assessments | Official Website
Debbie Dunaway Supervisor of Assessments | Official Website
The Shelby County Board convened for its regular meeting, where several issues were brought to light. A resignation letter was discussed, highlighting concerns about the disregard for board policy developed by professional agencies and approved by two past State’s Attorneys. The current State’s Attorney has reportedly altered these policies, leading to frustration among some members.
A discussion arose regarding the use of ARPA funds. Ms. Cole's statements during the meeting were challenged, with a reminder that "ARPA money must be contracted for use by the end of this year and actually spent by the end of 2026."
The budget committee's role was emphasized as crucial despite the recent resignation of its Chairman. The meeting suggested a belief that progress on the budget cannot continue without Orman, although he was previously considered dispensable.
Legal obligations concerning county expenditures were reiterated, citing Illinois law (55 ILCS 5/6-1005), which prohibits contracts or obligations exceeding appropriations. Violations are classified as Class B misdemeanors according to Section 6-1008.
Questions about financial reports led to criticism of how inquiries were directed at board meetings rather than seeking explanations from the treasurer directly. The Treasurer clarified discrepancies in committed funds: “The reason the number uncommitted increased is because...there is no binding contract.”
Audit findings and corrective measures were also discussed, with concerns raised about potential delays if new committees lack experienced members.
During the meeting, legal counsel made a statement regarding union negotiations: “Bargaining has not been ongoing, uhm, at least in good faith with the union representative.” This comment could impact labor relations due to legal requirements for good faith negotiations.
Finally, it was noted that government operations should continue despite vacancies on the board following resignations. Legal guidance on proceeding after such events appeared lacking during discussions.