East Central Reporter

City of Olney City Council Met June 28.

Here is the minutes provided by the council:

AGENDA #1 “CALL TO ORDER” The meeting of the Olney City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Olney City Hall located at 300 S. Whittle Avenue, Olney, Illinois, with Mayor Mark Lambird presiding.

AGENDA #2 “PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG-PRAYER” Council members and visitors joined in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. Jeff Belmear led the group in prayer.

AGENDA #3 “ROLL CALL” The following Council members were present: Greg Eyer, Morgan Fehrenbacher, Belinda Henton, John McLaughlin, and Mark Lambird. Also present were City Manager Allen Barker, City Treasurer Jane Guinn, City Attorney Bart Zuber, City Engineer Mike Bridges, and Deputy City Clerk Cindy Harlan.

AGENDA #4 “PRESENTATION OF CONSENT AGENDA”

4-A “Approve Minutes of Council Meeting on June 14, 2021”

4-B “Approve and Authorize Payment of Accounts Payable June 29, 2021” Pooled Cash $69,578.59; Manual Pooled Cash $30,253.33; Water Deposit Refunds $1,561.35; OSLAD $2,394.25; Jasper/Lincoln Waterline $74,333.94; Route 130 TIF $527.02

4-C “Raffle License: Olney Memorial VFW #4226”

4-D “Raffle License: Rolling Thunder ®IL. 3”

4-E “Raffle License: East Richland FFA Alumni”

AGENDA #5 “REMOVAL OF ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA” No items were requested for removal from the consent agenda.

AGENDA #6 “CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA” Councilwoman Fehrenbacher moved to approve the items on the consent agenda, seconded by Councilman Eyer. A majority affirmative voice vote was received.

AGENDA #7 “CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA” No items were requested for removal from the consent agenda.

AGENDA #8 “PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE OUT OF CDBG FUNDED DOWNSTATE SMALL BUSINESS STABILIZATIN GRANT FOR RDMNZ, INC.” Due to the outbreak of COVID-19 and its detrimental impact on small businesses, the State invoked its option to adjust allocations to address specific needs to benefit Illinois’ non-entitlement communities in case of unforeseen circumstances, as included in the Consolidated and Action Plans. This allocation, along with unspent and recaptured funds from previous allocations, was made eligible in a total of $20,000,000.00 for the Downstate Small Business Stabilization Program.

The City of Olney applied for the use of federal Downstate Small Business Stabilization Grant funds through the State of Illinois’ Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Office of Community Development on behalf of RDMNZ, Inc.

The Small Business Stabilization Program’s grant ceiling was $25,000.00 per business, and was applied for to be used towards working capital for the benefit of RDMNZ, Inc., in which the City of Olney made application on its behalf. The intent of the grant program was for the urgent needs of the business due to the COVID-19 emergency. The grant funds could be used to assist private for-profit small retail and service businesses, or businesses considered non essential by the Governor’s Executive Order without the ability for employees to work remotely.

Funds were available to all eligible applicants meeting program component requirements until all funds allocated to this component had been distributed. All awards were predicated upon a demonstrated need for funds. This included a review of all sources and uses of funds, an analysis of the recipient’s ability to comply with the terms of the program, and a determination that the CDBG participation was appropriate.

Mayor Lambird reminded those present that a $25,000.00 grant had been awarded for RDMNZ, Inc. The City did not expend any of its own funds on the project and did not displace any persons on low-to-moderate income dwellings as a result of this project.

A copy of the application package would be maintained on file at City Hall for public inspection.

In order to close out this grant project for RDMNZ, Inc., Mayor Lambird asked if anyone present had any questions or comments. Seeing none, the public hearing ended at 7:07 p.m.

AGENDA #9 “PRESENTATION OF ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, ETC.” 

9-A “Class S Liquor License for The Fireside at the Fall Street Concert Event & Closure of Whittle Avenue, from Market to Chestnut, from 5:00 P.M. on August 21, 2021, Until 2:00 A.M. on August 22, 2021” Tosha Hancock was present to explain her request for a Class S liquor license for an outdoor event sponsored by the Fireside. She is also requesting to close Whittle Avenue from Market to Chestnut from 5:00 p.m. on August 21st until 2:00 a.m. on August 22nd. This event is similar to an event held on May 22nd which was a family event with no request to close Whittle Avenue. The Fall Street Concert Event will be for 21 and over patrons only.

Councilman Eyer read from the liquor control ordinance that authorizes hours for Class S licenses from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Friday and Saturday. City Attorney Zuber advised the Council can approve a variance on these requirements. Councilman Henton believes 2:00 a.m. is too late for people to be outside as residential properties are nearby. She suggested that the bands quit playing at midnight.

Mrs. Hancock responded the bands have always played until 1:00 a.m. in the past, and there haven’t been any problems. Last call to serve alcohol will be at 1:00 or 1:15 a.m. The 2:00 a.m. request is to allow time for everyone to clear out.

Councilwoman Fehrenbacher moved to approve the Class S Liquor License as requested, seconded by Councilman McLaughlin. A majority affirmative voice vote was received.

9-B “Availability of Various Classifications of Liquor License” Mr. Lekhraj Ahuja was in attendance to inquire about the availability of liquor licenses for a new establishment he wants to open that will provide food, a bar, and video gaming. A separate building will be constructed on his property at 1301 S. West Street which is also the location of Midtown Package Liquor. The two businesses will be separate corporations.

Mayor Lambird advised that a Class A (Tavern License), Class C (Restaurant License), or a Class E (Restaurant or Entertainment Venue License – Beer and Wine Only) could be considered.

Councilwoman Henton questioned if the two separate buildings/businesses could be located on the same lot. Mayor Lambird answered that since the property is zoned C-2, it is allowed. Setbacks for C-2 properties are small.

Councilman Eyer expressed his appreciation to Mr. Ahuja that he is considering expanding his business and opening a restaurant. However, he is not in support of more gambling in Olney. Mr. Eyer would like to see site plans, how many patrons will be served, number of employees, and a menu.

Mayor Lambird inquired if the Council members are interested in considering a liquor license for this venture. Councilman McLaughlin stated he would consider a restaurant or tavern license, not a gaming license.

Councilwoman Fehrenbacher asked if there would be ample parking for two businesses. Mr. Ahuja assured her there will be. Mr. Ahuja also invited the Council members to visit anytime to verify that food is being served.

Both Councilwoman Fehrenbacher and Councilman McLaughlin confirmed they would consider allowing a Class A license, but not Class V. Councilman Eyer stated he would support a license for an establishment serving food Mayor Lambird cautioned that more than 50% of sales must be non-alcohol purchases if issued a Class E license.

Mr. Ahuja advised he will present the requested paperwork at the next Council meeting on July 12, 2021.

9-C “Discussion/Possible Ordinance: Amend Section 5.48.040 (Licensing Requirements) of the City of Olney Municipal Code” Included in the Council packets was a copy of Ordinance 2020-30 establishing regulations for Food Truck Vendors. Also included were copies of previous minutes from meetings during which regulations for food truck vendors were discussed.

Mayor Lambird brought to the Council’s attention Section 5.48.040, Licensing requirements, which requires a criminal background check for each employee authorized to conduct sales on behalf of the applicant. He feels this requirement is a bit overbearing considering a vendor may have 9 or 10 part-time employees.

Mayor Lambird moved to amend Section 5.48.040 to read that only the owners/managers are required to have background checks, seconded by Councilwoman Fehrenbacher. A majority affirmative voice vote was received. Ordinance No. 2021-12 will be prepared.

9-D “Ordinance: Authorize Execution of a Lease of Municipally Owned Real Property at the East Fork Lake Dam” City Manager Barker brought the Council’s attention to a proposed ordinance authorizing the lease of City-owned property at the East Fork Lake Dam as prepared by City Attorney Zuber. Gerald Geltz, recently approached the City to lease this property on behalf of Lakeside RV Park. The Council was agreeable to lease the property for a five- year term for an annual rental fee of $1,000. Mr. Geltz and his attorney have approved the lease as proposed.

Councilman McLaughlin moved to approve Ordinance 2021-13 as presented, seconded by Councilwoman Henton. A majority affirmative voice vote was received.

9-E “Discussion/Possible Action: Community Development Block Grant to Reline Certain Sanitary Sewers” City Manager Barker reported that briefly discussed at the last meeting was the need to reline certain sanitary sewers in Olney. Mr. Barker is seeking approval from the Council to proceed with preparing an application to the state for a Community Development Block Grant. A formal resolution will need to be approved at a later date. At the last meeting, the Council approved a sewer rate increase to be eligible to receive grants. This project is one of many in a long-term plan to replace, repair, and reline various sewer lines in the City.

City Engineer Bridges advised that roughly 13,000 feet of sewer lines will be relined which is a very small portion of the 60 miles of lines. Not all of them require relining, but this project is a start.

Mr. Barker explained that there are problems of inflow of water during heavy rains. The estimated life of relining is 40 to 50 years unless there is substantial movement.

Councilman Eyer moved to approve the general plan as presented, seconded by Councilwoman Henton. A majority affirmative voice vote was received.

AGENDA #10 “REPORTS FROM ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS” 

10-A “Status Report-City Manager” City Manager Barker reported that the walking trail at the City Park is progressing nicely as over 1,000 feet is poured. The work done thus far is impressive. He also advised that the attendance at last week’s Sounds of Summer concert was over 150 with a show enjoyed by all.

Councilman McLaughlin reminded the Council that at the last meeting he asked City Treasurer Guinn to prepare information on the history of water and sewer rate increases. In the last seven years, water rates have increased 40.45% while sewer rates have increased 98.04%. These percentage increases do not include the debt service/capital improvement fee increases. Olney’s rates are lower when compared to other communities, but since rates have been increased significantly, maybe in the future the Council should consider lowering the capital improvement fees. He cautioned to keep this in mind if the City is required to raise fees next year to maintain grant eligibility.

10-B “RCDC Report” Lauren McClain, RCDC Director, reported that the Walldogs were in town last week to do a mural on W. Main Street. She encouraged everyone to get out and meet the painters the next time they are in town. A grant application for Grow Olney was submitted on June 20, 2021.

10-C “Chamber of Commerce Report” Councilwoman Fehrenbacher reminded everyone of the Chamber golf outing the end of July.

10-D “Parks & Recreation Board Report” There was nothing to report.

10-E “Tourism Board Report” There was nothing to report.

AGENDA #11 “PUBLIC COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS”

Jeff Belmear, pastor at the Methodist church, expressed his concern about another gambling facility opening in Olney. He has seen a lot of lives destroyed as a result of this addiction. He believes Olney is a beautiful community, and poor people get taken advantage of the most. He thanked the Council for allowing him to speak on this topic.

AGENDA #12 “CLOSED SESSION: SALE OR LEASE PRICE OF REAL PROPERTY; ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY; APPOINTMENT, EMPLOYMENT, COMPENSATION, AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC EMPLOYEES” Councilwoman Henton moved to adjourn to closed session to discuss sale or lease price of real property; acquisition of real property; appointment, employment, compensation, and performance of specific employees, seconded by Councilman McLaughlin. A majority affirmative voice vote was received.

The meeting adjourned to closed session at 7:35 p.m.

AGENDA #13 “RECONVENE OPEN SESSION” Councilwoman Henton moved to enter back into open session, seconded by Councilwoman Fehrenbacher. A majority affirmative voice vote was received. Open session resumed at 8:04 p.m.

13-A “Ordinance: Authorize the Execution of a Warranty Deed” Councilman McLaughlin moved to approve Ordinance No. 2021-14 as presented, seconded by Councilwoman Henton. A majority affirmative voice vote was received.

Mayor Lambird moved to recess for a few minutes, seconded by Councilman McLaughlin. A majority affirmative voice vote was received. The meeting recessed at 8:05 p.m.

Councilman McLaughlin moved to enter back into open session, seconded by Councilwoman Fehrenbacher. A majority affirmative voice vote was received. The meeting reconvened at 8:08 p.m.

13-B “Discussion/Possible Action: Entertainment Tax and Development Agreement” Prior to this evening’s meeting, the City Council received a memo from City Attorney Bart Zuber explaining a proposed project in Olney involving the purchase of the Arcadia theatre property on Main Street and its future development. Also prior to the meeting, the Business Plan for The Arcadia Reception Hall & Event Center was provided to each Council member. The developers, Mr. & Mrs. Smith, were in attendance to answer any questions. They are making two requests from the City as detailed below.

The first is for the City to approve an Entertainment/Amusement tax (hereinafter referred to as “tax”). It is proposed that the tax be levied on an entity that is for-profit, operates out of an indoor venue that is at least 8000 square feet in size, has a liquor license, and holds various ticket-only events. The tax would be assessed at $3.00 per ticket sold.

In summary, the second request involves entering into a Development Agreement with DK Smith, LLC (hereinafter referred to as the “Developer”). The business would be subject to the $3.00 per ticket tax on events for which an admission is collected, the business would be operational by January 2024, the Developer would spend at least $500,000 to improve the building, and the City would reimburse the Developer 100% of the tax paid by the business. In addition, if the tax does not equal $11,250.00 per quarter, then the City will supplement said amount up to $11,250 per quarter. The agreement shall terminate when the City has reimbursed/paid the Developer the lesser of $900,000.00 or 90% of the approved construction costs incurred by the Developer prior to the opening date of the business, or the business closes or does not sell a total of at least 1000 tickets over the course of four consecutive quarters.

Currently, the Smith’s own and operate Venue 720 in Flora, Illinois. The Flora business will continue to operate focusing more on weddings and fundraisers when the Arcadia is operational in Olney.

Councilwoman Fehrenbacher expressed her full support of the $3.00 per ticket Entertainment/Amusement tax, and said she was very excited about the project, and the revitalization of downtown. However, she is struggling with the fact that the City is guaranteeing up to $11,250.00 per quarter if the tax does not generate the guaranteed amount.

Lauren McClain, Executive Director of RCDC, explained the numbers in the Business Plan are very conservative. She does not believe this commitment will be a burden to the City.

Mr. Smith stated the $3.00 tax should generate between $27,000 to $42,000 annually depending upon how many outdoor concerts and festivals are held. He has since re-evaluated and increased the projected event numbers in the initial Business Plan to be more realistic.

Mrs. McClain believes the numbers in the plan may be correct for years one and two, but there will be significant growth in subsequent years to alleviate the burden of the City.

Mr. Smith also believes that the City will recognize additional revenue from the Arcadia as a result of more hotel/motel, video gaming, and sales taxes. His business has generated significant hotel/motel tax revenue for the City of Flora, and it is only open one day per week.

Councilwoman Fehrenbacher wished there were more detailed figures with respect to the remodeling estimates. She believes the numbers are very high.

Mr. Smith responded that currently construction costs are very high, but he hopes those will decrease by the time renovation begins. Estimated expenses may decrease depending upon whether the back wall is structurally sound and doesn’t have to be torn out. Because of the shape of the existing floor in the theater, it will need to be leveled and will have different heights. There are also a lot of big- ticket items to install such as a sound system. He chose to go big with the estimate so he does not have to come back later if the estimate is too low. If the remodeling can be accomplished with $650,000, that would be great.

Mrs. McClain advised the Council that Mr. Smith will be applying for various grants as there is a lot of grant money available for these types of projects.

Councilwoman Fehrenbacher explained the entertainment/amusement tax is the City’s contribution toward this project. She believes other opportunities such as grants should be pursued by the Developer. She has a problem with using taxpayer’s money to remodel a building that the Developer owns.

City Attorney Zuber summarized again the proposed contribution from the City is $45,000 per year capped at the lesser of $900,000 or 90% of the approved construction costs incurred by the Developer. It could be a 20-year term if $900,000 is less than 90% of the approved construction costs. It is yet to be determined. Or, if 90% of approved costs is paid in $45,000 per year increments, the term could be 20, 11, or 6 years.

Mr. Smith suggested that if ticket sales generate more than $45,000 in taxes, he would prefer to get the City’s reimbursement faster and get loans paid down as soon as possible.

Councilman McLaughlin pointed out the Development Agreement shall terminate if the business closes or does not sell a total of at least 1000 tickets during four consecutive quarters.

Mr. Smith advised if there is no interest in shows, the business will transition to weddings, special events, and fundraisers.

Councilman Eyer expressed his excitement about the project. A historical building will be remodeled in an artistic community, and people with experience are willing to invest in downtown Olney. The challenge now is to protect the City and its citizens.

Councilwoman Henton stated the citizens aren’t paying the money as it will be tourism dollars.

Mr. Smith reminded everyone that the business will generate additional hotel/motel, sales, and video gaming tax revenue as well. He believes the Arcadia will be booked every weekend. A summary was provided to the Council of the number of attendees of various Venue 720 events who do not live in the area. Online ticket sales data is available to track this information. He believes in one way or another, the City will benefit from this project considering the Flora operation is only open one day per week.

Mrs. McClain confirmed the intent is to have ticketed sales.

Councilman Eyer reviewed the number of tickets that would have to be sold per week/year to generate the revenue needed to meet the City’s commitment. He was a bit concerned if there would be enough tax revenue from big events to do this.

Mr. Smith advised he wants a guarantee of the City’s investment until he is debt free. As outlined previously, the proposed terms of the Development Agreement would reimburse to the Developer the $3.00 per ticket tax up to $45,000 per year with a cap.

Councilman McLaughlin confirmed it is a risk, but the City is gaining a lot more. He believes the Council should be willing to try to do something to improve the City. Councilman Eyer agreed there is a need to move forward.

Councilwoman Henton expressed concern that the City’s contribution is tied to the remodeling costs. In the past the City has given grants to others when hosting events in Olney. The Cummins Municipal Band is paid $1,250 per night for five nights per year which benefits about 70 people each event. She is of the opinion it makes more sense to tie the contribution to events. It would give the Developer an incentive to have more events to create more tourism dollars and not commit the City to $45,000 per year based on construction costs.

Mr. Smith advised that when the City’s commitment to his business is terminated, the City will be able to keep the entertainment/amusement tax generated from ticket sales.

It was confirmed by Mr. Smith that the nickel staircase in the lobby will be maintained. Also, he estimates $35,000 in revenue per year from gambling.

City Attorney Bart Zuber suggested that Mr. Smith and City Treasurer Guinn get together at the end of the year to evaluate the numbers. If ticket sales generate more tax than the commitment, it could still be given to Mr. Smith thus shortening the term of the City’s commitment. When data for the quarter is submitted to the City, there will be an electronic log to reconcile the ticket sales. Currently, the bands performing require this data as well.

Mr. Smith reassured the Council that he will be able to get the necessary performers to come to Olney to generate the needed sales.

City Attorney Zuber advised that the City’s TIF attorney, Terry Bruckert, has been consulted about the City implementing an amusement tax. Mr. Bruckert advised it is legal and doable.

Councilwoman Fehrenbacher advised it is possible that other businesses could meet the criteria to charge an amusement tax if the ordinance to implement one is approved. The business could also request a reimbursement from the City of the tax received by the City.

Councilwoman Henton threw out that the City could reimburse the $3.00 as long as the Developer is in business. Mr. Smith preferred the City’s commitment to be paid more quickly so that he can pay off his bank loan. He would then recommend the City keep the amusement tax revenue and put it toward a community fund. City Attorney Zuber commented no promises should be made to that effect.

Councilman Eyer moved to approve a $3.00 per ticket entertainment tax on any entity meeting the criteria, seconded by Councilman McLaughlin. A majority affirmative voice vote was received. City Attorney Zuber will prepare Ordinance No. 2021-15.

Councilwoman Henton inquired if anyone liked the incentive-based idea for grants. City Attorney Zuber asked how the City would be contractually bound to give grants on a per event basis. This could happen multiple times per month.

Mayor Lambird preferred the idea of equalizing the City’s contribution after the last quarter of each year. Or, Mrs. McClain said, any extra could be put toward reducing the time of the City’s commitment.

Both Councilwomen Henton and Fehrenbacher do not like the fact that the City’s contribution is based on the remodeling cots.

Councilman Eyer stated that if this venture is successful, it will have a tremendous effect on the rest of downtown. It is a risk, but there have been very few opportunities thus far to revitalize downtown. Citizens will benefit from entertainment, additional restaurants, and bringing a momentum to the downtown area. Additional revenue could also be recognized as pointed out by Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith commented that the sale of 15,000 tickets per year is doable. Councilman McLaughlin is of the opinion the huge reward overshadows the minimal loss.

Councilman Eyer pointed out that if this project doesn’t happen, the City may be left with the liability of an abandoned building.

Mrs. McClain pointed out that grants cannot be pursued until the business is established. Any grants received will go toward the City’s commitment.

As an example, City Attorney Zuber stated that if the Developer receives a grant in the amount of $45,000, and the City’s commitment is $450,000, the City’s commitment reduces to $405,000.

Mr. Smith assured the Council he will apply for grants to finance theaters. He wants to be out of debt and doesn’t want the City to kick in tourism funds to meet the commitment. Mrs. McClain stated she will be happy to assist in grant writing. Mr. Smith said he is friends with a DCEO representative and that he has one year to find these grants. However, he has to be operational to be eligible for grants.

Mrs. McClain said the Community Reinvestment Act has millions of dollars available for these types of projects, and Mr. Smith will need letters of support from the City.

A short discussion was held on the benefits of a TIF district versus the City committing to this type of project.

Councilwoman Henton reminded the Council that the City donates $20,000 per year from the Tourism Fund to the Tourism Convention Bureau each year for advertising.

Again, Mr. Smith pointed out that he believes the remodeling costs will be closer to $750,000 to $800,000, however, the costs will depend on the condition of the roof, back wall, and the cost of lumber. It is not feasible to wait three years to begin this project.

City Attorney Zuber commented there is a bank willing to loan money to Mr. Smith for this project with a projected opening date of January 2024.

Mrs. Guinn’s only concern was that if the City’s contribution will be coming from tourism dollars, that the tourism fund continues to increase in 20 years.

Councilman McLaughlin moved to enter into a Development Agreement with DK Smith, LLC, substantively similar to the proposal outlined in the City Attorney’s memorandum dated June 23, 2021, with three additions or clarifications.

First, at the conclusion of the fourth quarter of each year the City Treasurer would evaluate the total amount that the Developer had been reimbursed in the previous three quarters from the City’s Tourism Fund or General Fund. If, in light of the amount of ticket sales for all four quarters, Developer would be reimbursed more than $45,000.00, then the City would retain from what would otherwise be the fourth quarter reimbursement any amounts over $11,250.00 up to an amount necessary to fully refund the Tourism Fund and General Fund for amounts paid out of either of those funds in the first three quarters of the year. Once those City funds had been reimbursed, then any further amounts remaining owed to Developer for tickets sales for that fourth quarter would be reimbursed to Developer and thereby further reducing the City’s total commitment.

Second, the City’s total commitment shall be reduced by any grants received by Developer.

Third, Developer may transfer its rights and obligations under the Agreement to a subsequent owner upon City approval. Such approval will not be unreasonably withheld. The motion was seconded by Councilman Eyer.

After the motion was made, Councilwoman Henton asked if everyone was good with the minimum 1,000 ticket sales figure as outlined in paragraph E of the memo prepared by City Attorney Zuber. Mr. Zuber suggested that raising the 1000 minimum was an option. Councilman McLaughlin commented that even if zero tickets are sold for three quarters, the City would only be out $33,750 and then the agreement would terminate. Councilwoman Fehrenbacher did point out that the City would also be out any other money paid if the business did not fail under Year Eight.

A brief discussion was held that even if events are held in other locations in Olney, the ticket sales are subject to the amusement tax.

Councilwoman Fehrenbacher pointed out that according to City Attorney Zuber’s memo, approval of construction costs must not be unreasonably withheld by the City. Construction costs may include lighting and sound equipment, basically, any items permanently affixed to the building or coolers for the bar. City Attorney Zuber stated that is why there is a cap on the City’s commitment.

Upon roll call of the motion made earlier by Councilman McLaughlin and seconded by Councilman Eyer, Councilman McLaughlin, Mayor Lambird, Councilman Eyer, and Councilwoman Henton voted yes. Councilwoman Fehrenbacher voted no. The motion carried. Ordinance No. 2021-16 authorizing entering into a Development Agreement with DK Smith, LLC, will be prepared by City Attorney Zuber.

Mr. Smith advised he will do a press release at a later time when final details are available on the business name, etc.

AGENDA #14 “ADJOURN” With no further business to discuss, Councilman McLaughlin moved to adjourn, seconded by Councilwoman Fehrenbacher. A majority affirmative voice vote was received.

The meeting adjourned at 9:31 p.m.

https://www.ci.olney.il.us/cc%20June%2028,%202021%20Open%20Session.pdf