East Central Reporter

Legislators are preparing for the Lame Duck session scheduled from January 4 to 7. The session has drawn criticism from Republicans who argue that it fosters the creation of controversial policies away from public scrutiny. Historically, Democrats have used this period to pass significant legislation before new officials take office.

The "SAFE-T Act," passed in 2021 during a Lame Duck session, is cited as an example of such controversial legislation. The act, which ended cash bail in Illinois, was supported solely by Democrats. Critics argue that this law has led to increased crime rates and hindered police effectiveness. However, Democrats maintain that crime statistics show a decline.

Another piece of legislation that faced opposition is the "Protect Illinois Communities" Act. This law bans the sale and delivery of assault weapons in Illinois and remains in effect pending further legal challenges.

As lawmakers gear up for this year's Lame Duck session, State Representative Chris Miller expressed concerns about potential policy decisions. He stated: “Unfortunately, Lame Duck session is not designed to pass positive legislation that benefits the residents of Illinois. I’m sure this year, delusional Democrats will huddle up in a back room behind closed doors and craft policy which puts Illinois citizens last.”

Recent headlines reflect ongoing debates around legislative actions during these sessions:

- "Lame-Duck Illinois Lawmakers Vote Themselves a 16% Raise"

- "Pritzker Administration Targets $520 Million Corporate Tax Loopholes in Advance of Lame Duck Session"

- "Abolishing cash bail: Timeline of the SAFE-T Act in the Illinois legislature and courts"

- "Illinois House Passes Assault Weapons Ban, Abortion Legislation"